Post

5 followers Follow
Avatar
5

Forest-friendly paper and non-toxic inks!

I'd gladly pay a premium to know that my books are being printed on forest-friendly paper with non-toxic inks. JK Rowling insisted on this for the Harry Potter books, and it makes sense: some paper is produced from old-growth forest which don't return to their state of biodiversity for (seriously) thousands of years. You can replant trees, you can't recreate a forest. That's a terrible price to pay for a book. And completely unnecessary. There's a certification system called FSC which monitors how paper is made and certifies the good stuff.  Who's with me? It would be great to see Blurb offer this option. 

BRIANFIT

Please sign in to leave a comment.

5 comments

Avatar
0

Hi BRIANFIT. Most of our papers do have one or more eco-friendly certifications, and our standard photo paper has 10% recycled content. We don't have a 100% recycled paper but our product team is aware that some Blurb authors would like that option. And by nature print on demand is much more eco-friendly than traditional offset printing, since we print only what is needed. That reduces the chance of wasted resources from unsold/unwanted books.

For more information on the ink used in our HP Indigo presses, including HP's safety and recycling info, please see the  information below. Clicking the link will download a PDF with HP's ink FAQs.

http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA3-9326EEW.pdf

Michael Y. 0 votes
Comment actions Permalink
Avatar
2

Specifically, is any of the paper you use FSC certified?

mckennamlin 2 votes
Comment actions Permalink
Avatar
1

Hi mckennamlin. Yes, almost all our papers are FSC certified,with a few exceptions due to regional differences in papers. For specifics contact our customer support team and let them know exactly which paper type(s) you're interested in, the book size/format, and the shipping destination of the books. 

Michael Y. 1 vote
Comment actions Permalink
Avatar
1

Yes! 100% with you on this, it should really be the standard practise in 2017, not an 'extra' but i'm also more than willing to pay a premium to know that old growth woodland is not being affected by my indirect actions. Same goes for the inks.....

joemaclay 1 vote
Comment actions Permalink

Community is not available in this language

Help Center